Skip to content

Bidar vs Tiruchirappalli

Side-by-side air quality comparison between Bidar and Tiruchirappalli.

Cleaner right now: Tiruchirappalli (19-pt gap)Historical head-to-head: Tiruchirappalli cleaner 54/58 daysYoY 20212024: Bidar +1.2% · Tiruchirappalli -31.5%

Live AQI from Open-Meteo CAMS (~45 km global model, updated hourly). Multi-year history from CPCB station data via aqinow.co pipeline (2016–2024, station-level daily records).

AQI Comparison

Bidar

Karnataka, India

Good

PM2.5: 16.5 µg/m³

View full AQI →
VS
🏆 Cleaner

Tiruchirappalli

Tamil Nadu, India

Good

PM2.5: 5.4 µg/m³

View full AQI →
Pollutant-level comparison (PM2.5, PM10, O3, NO2, SO2, CO)
PollutantBidarTiruchirappalli
PM2.5(µg/m³)16.505.40
PM10(µg/m³)22.506.60
NO₂(µg/m³)7.307.20
SO₂(µg/m³)2.403.10
O₃(µg/m³)64.0038.00
CO(µg/m³)204.00134.00

CPCB Multi-Year History (2016–2024)

Loading historical data…

Summary

Overview

In 2024, Bidar averaged an AQI of 85 while Tiruchirappalli averaged 50 — a 35-point (70%) gap, with Bidar the more polluted and Tiruchirappalli the cleaner of the two. On 58 days when both cities reported, Tiruchirappalli was cleaner on 54 of them; the average daily gap was 49 AQI points.

Seasonality & days

Both cities see their worst air in January on average. Bidar logged 0.1% Severe days and 72.5% Good-or-Satisfactory days; Tiruchirappalli was 0% Severe and 96.5% Good-or-Satisfactory. Longest clean-air streaks: Bidar 24 days, Tiruchirappalli 46 days.

Year-over-year progress

Bidar has worsened by 1 AQI points (1.2%) from 2021 to 2024; Tiruchirappalli has improved by 23 AQI points (31.5%) over the same window. The worst recorded day for Bidar reached AQI 437 at Naubad (KSPCB) on 2022-01-25; Tiruchirappalli hit AQI 114 at St Joseph College (TNPCB) on 2024-01-14.

Station-level disparity

Bidar spans 1 CPCB stations with a 0-point spread (min 84, max 84); Tiruchirappalli spans 1 stations with a 0-point spread (min 52, max 52).

Verdict

🏆 Tiruchirappalli has better air quality with an AQI of 9 compared to Bidar's 28.

Popular Comparisons