Skip to content

Muzaffarnagar vs Sikar

Side-by-side air quality comparison between Muzaffarnagar and Sikar.

Cleaner right now: Sikar (26-pt gap)Historical head-to-head: Sikar cleaner 403/567 daysYoY 20182024: Muzaffarnagar -18.3% · Sikar +3%

Live AQI from Open-Meteo CAMS (~45 km global model, updated hourly). Multi-year history from CPCB station data via aqinow.co pipeline (2016–2024, station-level daily records).

AQI Comparison

Muzaffarnagar

Uttar Pradesh, India

Satisfactory

PM2.5: 56.7 µg/m³

View full AQI →
VS
🏆 Cleaner

Sikar

Rajasthan, India

Satisfactory

PM2.5: 27.6 µg/m³

View full AQI →
Pollutant-level comparison (PM2.5, PM10, O3, NO2, SO2, CO)
PollutantMuzaffarnagarSikar
PM2.5(µg/m³)56.7027.60
PM10(µg/m³)64.5068.20
NO₂(µg/m³)28.8012.80
SO₂(µg/m³)9.805.40
O₃(µg/m³)39.0065.00
CO(µg/m³)1050.00223.00

CPCB Multi-Year History (2016–2024)

Loading historical data…

Summary

Overview

In 2024, Muzaffarnagar averaged an AQI of 179 while Sikar averaged 139 — a 40-point (29%) gap, with Muzaffarnagar the more polluted and Sikar the cleaner of the two. On 567 days when both cities reported, Sikar was cleaner on 403 of them; the average daily gap was 57 AQI points.

Seasonality & days

Muzaffarnagar peaks in December, while Sikar peaks in January. Muzaffarnagar logged 1.1% Severe days and 24.799999999999997% Good-or-Satisfactory days; Sikar was 0.2% Severe and 34% Good-or-Satisfactory. Longest clean-air streaks: Muzaffarnagar 25 days, Sikar 32 days.

Year-over-year progress

Muzaffarnagar has improved by 40 AQI points (18.3%) from 2018 to 2024; Sikar has worsened by 4 AQI points (3%) over the same window. The worst recorded day for Muzaffarnagar reached AQI 446 at New Mandi (UPPCB) on 2019-01-02; Sikar hit AQI 452 at Radhakishan Pura (RSPCB) on 2023-11-16.

Station-level disparity

Muzaffarnagar spans 1 CPCB stations with a 0-point spread (min 183, max 183); Sikar spans 1 stations with a 0-point spread (min 137, max 137).

Verdict

🏆 Sikar has better air quality with an AQI of 69 compared to Muzaffarnagar's 95.

Popular Comparisons